This paper presents SimCLR: a simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. We simplify recently proposed contrastive self-supervised learning algorithms without requiring specialized architectures or a memory bank. In order to understand what enables the contrastive prediction tasks to learn useful representations, we systematically study the major components of our framework. We show that (1) composition of data augmentations plays a critical role in defining effective predictive tasks, (2) introducing a learnable nonlinear transformation between the representation and the contrastive loss substantially improves the quality of the learned representations, and (3) contrastive learning benefits from larger batch sizes and more training steps compared to supervised learning. By combining these findings, we are able to considerably outperform previous methods for self-supervised and semi-supervised learning on ImageNet. A linear classifier trained on self-supervised representations learned by SimCLR achieves 76.5% top-1 accuracy, which is a 7% relative improvement over previous state-of-the-art, matching the performance of a supervised ResNet-50.
In this page, we provide benchmarks as much as possible to evaluate our pre-trained models. If not mentioned, all models are pre-trained on ImageNet-1k dataset.
The classification benchmarks includes 4 downstream task datasets, **VOC**, **ImageNet**, **iNaturalist2018** and **Places205**. If not specified, the results are Top-1 (%).
The **Best Layer** indicates that the best results are obtained from which layers feature map. For example, if the **Best Layer** is **feature3**, its best result is obtained from the second stage of ResNet (1 for stem layer, 2-5 for 4 stage layers).
Besides, k=1 to 96 indicates the hyper-parameter of Low-shot SVM.
The **Feature1 - Feature5** don't have the GlobalAveragePooling, the feature map is pooled to the specific dimensions and then follows a Linear layer to do the classification. Please refer to [resnet50_mhead_linear-8xb32-steplr-90e_in1k](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/classification/imagenet/resnet50_mhead_linear-8xb32-steplr-90e_in1k.py) for details of config.
The **AvgPool** result is obtained from Linear Evaluation with GlobalAveragePooling. Please refer to [resnet50_linear-8xb512-coslr-90e_in1k](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/classification/imagenet/resnet50_linear-8xb512-coslr-90e_in1k.py) for details of config.
The **Feature1 - Feature5** don't have the GlobalAveragePooling, the feature map is pooled to the specific dimensions and then follows a Linear layer to do the classification. Please refer to [resnet50_mhead_8xb32-steplr-28e_places205.py](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/classification/places205/resnet50_mhead_8xb32-steplr-28e_places205.py) for details of config.
The detection benchmarks includes 2 downstream task datasets, **Pascal VOC 2007 + 2012** and **COCO2017**. This benchmark follows the evluation protocols set up by MoCo.
Please refer to [faster_rcnn_r50_c4_mstrain_24k_voc0712.py](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/mmdetection/voc0712/faster_rcnn_r50_c4_mstrain_24k_voc0712.py) for details of config.
Please refer to [mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_mstrain_1x_coco.py](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/mmdetection/coco/mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_mstrain_1x_coco.py) for details of config.
The segmentation benchmarks includes 2 downstream task datasets, **Cityscapes** and **Pascal VOC 2012 + Aug**. It follows the evluation protocols set up by MMSegmentation.
Please refer to [fcn_r50-d8_512x512_20k_voc12aug.py](https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmselfsup/blob/master/configs/benchmarks/mmsegmentation/voc12aug/fcn_r50-d8_512x512_20k_voc12aug.py) for details of config.
