* Update LICENSE to AGPL-3.0
This pull request updates the license of the YOLOv5 project from GNU General Public License v3.0 (GPL-3.0) to GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0).
We at Ultralytics have decided to make this change in order to better protect our intellectual property and ensure that any modifications made to the YOLOv5 source code will be shared back with the community when used over a network.
AGPL-3.0 is very similar to GPL-3.0, but with an additional clause to address the use of software over a network. This change ensures that if someone modifies YOLOv5 and provides it as a service over a network (e.g., through a web application or API), they must also make the source code of their modified version available to users of the service.
This update includes the following changes:
- Replace the `LICENSE` file with the AGPL-3.0 license text
- Update the license reference in the `README.md` file
- Update the license headers in source code files
We believe that this change will promote a more collaborative environment and help drive further innovation within the YOLOv5 community.
Please review the changes and let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <glenn.jocher@ultralytics.com>
* Update headers to AGPL-3.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <glenn.jocher@ultralytics.com>
* precommit: yapf
* align isort
* fix
# Conflicts:
# utils/plots.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update setup.cfg
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update setup.cfg
* Update setup.cfg
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update wandb_utils.py
* Update augmentations.py
* Update setup.cfg
* Update yolo.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update val.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* simplify colorstr
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* val run fix
* export.py last comma
* Update export.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update hubconf.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* PyTorch Hub tuple fix
* PyTorch Hub tuple fix2
* PyTorch Hub tuple fix3
* Update setup
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Glenn Jocher <glenn.jocher@ultralytics.com>
* Update loss.py
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Update loss.py
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update loss.py
implement the quality focal loss which is a more general case of focal loss
more detail in https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04388
In the obj loss (or the case cls loss with label smooth), the targets is no long barely be 0 or 1 (can be 0.7), in this case, the normal focal loss is not work accurately
quality focal loss in behave the same as focal loss when the target is equal to 0 or 1, and work accurately when targets in (0, 1)
example:
targets:
tensor([[0.6225, 0.0000, 0.0000],
[0.9000, 0.0000, 0.0000],
[1.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000]])
___________________________
pred_prob:
tensor([[0.6225, 0.2689, 0.1192],
[0.7773, 0.5000, 0.2227],
[0.8176, 0.8808, 0.1978]])
____________________________
focal_loss
tensor([[0.0937, 0.0328, 0.0039],
[0.0166, 0.1838, 0.0199],
[0.0039, 1.3186, 0.0145]])
______________
qfocal_loss
tensor([[7.5373e-08, 3.2768e-02, 3.9179e-03],
[4.8601e-03, 1.8380e-01, 1.9857e-02],
[3.9233e-03, 1.3186e+00, 1.4545e-02]])
we can see that targets[0][0] = 0.6255 is almost the same as pred_prob[0][0] = 0.6225,
the targets[1][0] = 0.9 is greater then pred_prob[1][0] = 0.7773 by 0.1227
however, the focal loss[0][0] = 0.0937 larger then focal loss[1][0] = 0.0166 (which against the purpose of focal loss)
for the quality focal loss , it implement the case of targets not equal to 0 or 1
* Update loss.py
